Balaji Srinivasan mentioned 'Seeing Like a State' on Twitter.
"Seeing Like a State" by James C. Scott is an influential work that explores the nature and consequences of state-led, top-down planning and development. With meticulously researched examples spanning centuries and continents, Scott uncovers the common traits of modern high-modernist schemes, revealing their often-destructive impact on societies.
Starting with agricultural planning, the book delves into the rationalization and simplification of landscapes to enhance production. Scott demonstrates how state intervention, spurred by visions of progress and control, leads to the implementation of standardized measures that disregard local practices and knowledge, resulting in ecological and socioeconomic upheavals.
Examining urban planning, Scott shows how grand designs impose a uniformity that neglects the organic growth and the complexities of the city. Whether in the form of monumental boulevards or rigid zoning laws, such interventions disregard the rich social networks and dynamics that emerge naturally.
Drawing on case studies spanning various domains, from forestry to taxation, Scott argues that these overly simplistic plans limit the agency of individuals, stifling decentralized decision-making and hindering adaptive responses. The book further reveals the inherent conflict between legibility and local knowledge, asserting that the state's drive for legibility and simplification often comes at the expense of diversity, resilience, and social cohesion.
In his analysis, Scott highlights the persistent belief in the transformative power of pure reason, wielded by those in authority. From utopian visions to technocratic fantasies, the book exposes the risks of this hubris-driven approach, warning against the dangers of all-encompassing plans that disregard the complexity and diversity of societies.
In "Seeing Like a State," James C. Scott provides a thought-provoking exploration of the failures and unintended consequences of state-led planning and development. With a compelling argument against high modernism's quest for legibility and control, this work stands as a cautionary tale for policymakers and citizens alike, urging us to reconsider the value of local knowledge and the importance of respecting diverse, complex systems.